Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Extreme amounts of weight/tension

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reality
    replied
    Originally posted by salamander6773 View Post

    It's all good. Glad to see you back, I wasn't sure if you quit or not. Seems like you have a much more positive vibe, I had to take a break a while back myself, lashed out on someone for no reason on here... I feel like positivity is a must around here.. Sometimes it's easy to get bogged down when the process seems frustratingly long. I hang on making steady but small gains. Realizing that this process is very possible, and is worth doing.

    It really is useful to the forum to have guys like you, Ron, greg b, woodyhoody, and Science Monk around... You have not only restored but been apart of the evolution of restoring, from manual, to t tape, to tapeless tuggers. The insight I have gathered here has been priceless.
    All the guys you've mentioned here are surprisingly silent lately; in my opinion they shouldn't be. One of those guys spoke up, but the others, not so much. One wonders. Anyhow, yeah, what is commonly considered positivity is difficult for me when confronted with the obvious. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • J9+stk
    replied
    That is a grandfather clock weight. I have a set this one weight 35 oz. the other one weighs 15.4 oz. I have had much success with this device.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    Originally posted by J9+stk View Post
    I am currently using 35 ounces. That is 2 pounds, 3 ounces. This hangs for an hour. It is removed, the penis massaged, rested an hour. Then the process repeats. I do not find this weight uncomfortable.
    Man, those pine cone weights! Thanks again, this is encouraging.

    Leave a comment:


  • J9+stk
    replied
    I am currently using 35 ounces. That is 2 pounds, 3 ounces. This hangs for an hour. It is removed, the penis massaged, rested an hour. Then the process repeats. I do not find this weight uncomfortable.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    Originally posted by Reality View Post

    (hunching shoulders, preparing for spirited discussion) Actually, you don't have to pull "forward", pulling in any direction causes skin to add more cells. We aren't creating a shape by pulling forward. Your shaft creates the "tube". I say this so that guys new to restoration won't worry that they have the ability to somehow goof up the shape of the tube. You can't do that.
    It's all good. Glad to see you back, I wasn't sure if you quit or not. Seems like you have a much more positive vibe, I had to take a break a while back myself, lashed out on someone for no reason on here... I feel like positivity is a must around here.. Sometimes it's easy to get bogged down when the process seems frustratingly long. I hang on making steady but small gains. Realizing that this process is very possible, and is worth doing.

    It really is useful to the forum to have guys like you, Ron, greg b, woodyhoody, and Science Monk around... You have not only restored but been apart of the evolution of restoring, from manual, to t tape, to tapeless tuggers. The insight I have gathered here has been priceless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Reality
    replied
    Originally posted by salamander6773 View Post
    it has to keep a cylindrical shape to work, stretching the skin forward only. I am thinking now that a spring loaded device with heavy duty springs could be a great option.
    (hunching shoulders, preparing for spirited discussion) Actually, you don't have to pull "forward", pulling in any direction causes skin to add more cells. We aren't creating a shape by pulling forward. Your shaft creates the "tube". I say this so that guys new to restoration won't worry that they have the ability to somehow goof up the shape of the tube. You can't do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    The balloon may not work, it has to keep a cylindrical shape to work, stretching the skin forward only. I am thinking now that a spring loaded device with heavy duty springs could be a great option.

    All of these ideas are already at work but I am talking something easy to apply and something that could be left on for a year at a time.

    Something that could be urinated through and easily cleaned while remaining on.

    These of course are just ideas, most of which have already been thought of. I just think that there is an opportunity here to create a end all be all device that hands down dominates the market and becomes the standard of foreskin restoration. Something so easy to apply and use that anyone could try it out.

    The tugger and dtr are great devices but must be modified to utilize certain types of tension.

    The pud is archaic, and is limited to hanging only.

    These devices are effective and smart, but I just think there is something we are all missing, a new idea that could be a game changer.

    At least you guys can admit that logistically speaking, foreskin restoration is extremely difficult to facilitate.

    Leave a comment:


  • greg_b
    replied
    There are already balloons that at least partially fit this description:

    https://www.amazon.com/Twisting-Ball...p_pl_dp_2&th=1

    In fact, that is what I use for my method of inflation.

    But I just do not see the difference with what you are proposing and what we already do. Nor do I see this avoiding anything that we already need to contend with. Maybe I am missing the point, but it seems just another inflation method to me, with a few minor differences. I do not think this will take much time to develop and try, just try it and see how you like it.

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • KragDragon
    replied
    Originally posted by Reality View Post
    The OTHER "foreseeable" problem is that sub epidermal expanders cause untoward effects, such as the formation of a hard, non "stretchable" capsule under the skin, which is an abnormal tissue. Do your research.
    True. I tried to envision an implanted expander but yeah... it would wreck the smooth gliding action of the foreskin most likely. I haven't done my research but I know any time you take the body apart and put it back together, it's never quite the same afterwards.

    However, if I read Salamander's post right, his idea isn't an implant, just a modified balloon device. Still won't work for overnight tugging though because of those pesky sleep erections.

    Leave a comment:


  • Reality
    replied
    The OTHER "foreseeable" problem is that sub epidermal expanders cause untoward effects, such as the formation of a hard, non "stretchable" capsule under the skin, which is an abnormal tissue. Do your research.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    I have an idea for a device that can be worn at night (or during the day), but it would take months of hard work to fully develop. Essentially it would be an inflatable cylinder that could extend to 12 to 16 inches long. A balloon type device but one that would retain its shape. It would be deflated and an o ring or tape would seal it off under your existing foreskin. Once secured, it would be inflated to its full length, allowing the skin to stretch as you sleep.

    It would be similar to having a penile implant, putting an O ring on, or taping your foreskin shut tightly and securely, and then pumping the penile implant to a full erection.

    The erection would stretch the skin over night naturally, and your sleep would never be effected in any way.

    Only foreseeable problem with the device would be pressure on the glans back into the pelvic area, but I feel like that would not be an issue really, as the device could be removed in seconds if trouble arises.

    This device, if used consistently would make a 2 year restoration a reality for everyone, even those without the option of day time tugging.

    This is like the balloon method, but with a cylindrical balloon that maintains the shape of an erect penis and can get to 16 inches if desired over time.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    I am going to say that more weight as long as it does not pinch, will stretch the skin farther and result in faster restoration progress.

    The problems that occur with tugging with 30 to 40 ounces instead of 15 to 20 is that, the device/tape may fail more consistently, and pinching can be an issue, and blisters can result if not carefully checked.

    But if you can get more weight/tension, from my experience it will speed up the restoration process, especially if 12 hours is never going to happen for you.

    Users have reported that they could not start with alot of weight but rather built up to it over months and years.

    This seems to be the case with me as the skin seems to take the weight better now that I have more to work with, whereas at first the pelvic area was inflamed severely with anything near 20 ounces.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    Originally posted by tommyreptar3 View Post

    i thought you said in an earlier post you were gonna use 10oz or so? because the heavier weight was too much for your fragile skin.
    Yes usually the weight would cause adverse reactions and I was not able to go higher than 18 ounces. I am trying this now, and because of my skin growth, the skin itself seems to be taking the bulk of the weight and not my pelvic area. (This is a theory obviously). I am able to do 40 ounces now, without an issue, other than the tape failing...

    I am supplementing with ginseng during the day, a multi, (hair skin nails formula), and magnesium at night. The magnesium seems to help alot.

    Leave a comment:


  • tommyreptar3
    replied
    Originally posted by salamander6773 View Post

    Thank you for this post, this is amazing man, you have alot of skin there.

    What is that purple gripper??? Where can I buy that?

    Any details on you routine would be appreciated. I am using the same PUD GP but with tape and am up to 40 ounces (2lbs). Seems to be working faster than 18 ounces. I also usually use 18 ounces, and have been seeing steady progress. I am really more or less experimenting with double the weight because I can't put in the hours needed, only about 2-4 most days, sometimes 6.

    EDIT: Found your one year project. Thank you for the scientific notations and details. I appreciate it.
    i thought you said in an earlier post you were gonna use 10oz or so? because the heavier weight was too much for your fragile skin.

    Leave a comment:


  • salamander6773
    replied
    Originally posted by foreskinproject View Post
    Here is my personal experience. Extreme tension does nothing to increase results. There seems to be a limit to how fast skin can grow. As long as the skin is stretched to its limit plus a little more it should trigger mitosis, everyone is different, but for me 18 oz is where my sweet spot is.

    *********I have added pictures of me with OVER 6 LBS (POUNDS) of tension and also a link to a video.***********

    http://www.pornhost.com/2662987752

    I can hold this for over 1 hour if I want to. I am just doing this for an example. Anything above 18 oz adds NOTHING for me as far as speed of restoration. Also I suffer no ill effects, no stretch marks or skin tears or pain. Its just extra weight. This restoration process has been going on for a long time, there should already be a science to this. Why is this still an experiment?
    Thank you for this post, this is amazing man, you have alot of skin there.

    What is that purple gripper??? Where can I buy that?

    Any details on you routine would be appreciated. I am using the same PUD GP but with tape and am up to 40 ounces (2lbs). Seems to be working faster than 18 ounces. I also usually use 18 ounces, and have been seeing steady progress. I am really more or less experimenting with double the weight because I can't put in the hours needed, only about 2-4 most days, sometimes 6.

    EDIT: Found your one year project. Thank you for the scientific notations and details. I appreciate it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X