Is The Glans Larger Than The Rest Of It?

[In_Correct]

Sorry but I really don't want to ask any body else, especially as I assume that everybody else is circumcised (and prefers it) and this is a medical question but is a strange question.

I assume that the glans is supposed to be larger than the shaft (or what ever it is caleld?) It is supposed to be "Mushroom" shaped, and the edge of the glans sticks out past the shaft, making the glans look larger than the shaft??

And even with Intact foreskins is there a noticeable "Lump" where the foreskin covers that .... whatever that sharp edge is called?!

My glans is larger than the shaft. Is this normal? And is it common? Or are tehre some men who have wide shafts and narrow glans?! In other words how common is it to have a sharp bump wrapped halfway around at teh edge of the glans making it look big?

I really do not want to look at pictures because the search results are not very accurate. .

I cannot help but wonder if any other person I encounter or even see ap icture of is Intact or not, although I sadly assume that thtye are sadly Cuircumcised. No I am not going to ask them either.

P.S. I have concluded
Circumcision Is a Sex Crime.
Inftatnt Circumsicino: It is a crime against chirldern.

[Swingshiftworker]

It is what is is. There is so much variation in human anatomy -- not just in our dicks -- that there really is no "normal." There are men w/thick and thin dicks. There are men w/short and long dicks. There are grow-ers and show-ers. There are men w/a big oversized mushroom head on their glans and most w/o.

However, among uncut and fully restored men, there is always some kind of "lump" in the foreskin covering the glans which can look wider/bigger than the shaft when flaccid but which generally does not become much larger or smaller relative to the shaft when erect.

There are all kinds of pictures of this that you say you don't want to look at BUT, in case you change your mind, here's a sight that will give you a clear picture of what you are concerned about in all of its variations: http://erikforeskin.tumblr.com/.

[admin]

Sorry but I really don't want to ask any body else, especially as I assume that everybody else is circumcised (and prefers it) and this is a medical question but is a strange question.

I assume that the glans is supposed to be larger than the shaft (or what ever it is caleld?) It is supposed to be "Mushroom" shaped, and the edge of the glans sticks out past the shaft, making the glans look larger than the shaft??

And even with Intact foreskins is there a noticeable "Lump" where the foreskin covers that .... whatever that sharp edge is called?!

My glans is larger than the shaft. Is this normal? And is it common? Or are tehre some men who have wide shafts and narrow glans?! In other words how common is it to have a sharp bump wrapped halfway around at teh edge of the glans making it look big?

I really do not want to look at pictures because the search results are not very accurate. .

I cannot help but wonder if any other person I encounter or even see ap icture of is Intact or not, although I sadly assume that thtye are sadly Cuircumcised. No I am not going to ask them either.

P.S. I have concluded
Circumcision Is a Sex Crime.
Inftatnt Circumsicino: It is a crime against chirldern.

Folks send me pics often to help them determine the right size device to wear. Glans a bit wider than shaft is most common, but shaft wider than glans is not at all rare.

[In_Correct]

So in other words it is pointless to try to determine if a body builder has a picture in his boxer briefs is intact or circumcised?