This is a groundbreaking piece of scholarship that makes the claim that circumcision victims shouldn't need to prove malpractice by the doctors who cut them.
Rather, a case can be built on medical fraud, which has a lower standard of proof in court and longer timeframe in statutes of limitations.
The Journal is here: https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/re...JLPP/index.cfm
And that page links to the article, here: https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/re...t-al-final.pdf
Rather, a case can be built on medical fraud, which has a lower standard of proof in court and longer timeframe in statutes of limitations.
The Journal is here: https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/re...JLPP/index.cfm
And that page links to the article, here: https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/re...t-al-final.pdf
Comment