Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2021-10-19 Journal of Pediatric Urology - Prevalence and Causes of Meatal Stenosis in Circumcised Boys

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2021-10-19 Journal of Pediatric Urology - Prevalence and Causes of Meatal Stenosis in Circumcised Boys

    Prevalence and Causes of Meatal Stenosis in Circumcised Boys

    https://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477...472-1/fulltext

    Bottom line:
    17.9 % of boys studied who had been cut in infancy were found to have abnormal narrowing of the urinary opening.

    Other complications of infant circumcision not within the scope of this study:
    = = =
    About half of circumcised males have issues they often don't even realize are due to circ, like skin bridges, stitch tunnels, asymmetry, jagged irregular scar, bulgy truncated vein, tightness upon erection, curvature, malapposition, adhesion of shaft skin to underlying structures, pits and gouges to the glans, zero inner skin remaining (scar line at corona), very little outer skin skin remaining (coarse hair growing to the scar line), skin tags, etc.
    -Ron Low
    [email protected]
    847 414-1692 Chicago

  • #2
    Thanks for posting this, Admin.

    I find it interesting that all the coauthors on this paper have institutional affiliations in Algeria.

    Click on the "Show More" arrow immediately beneath the list of names of the coauthors here:
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...77513121004721

    David
    World As Monkey Island
    I declared myself finished restoring with 3/4 erect coverage (CI-8.5) in 2005. I primarily used T-tape, strapping up and around my waist.
    I've participated in NORM meetings in San Diego, Los Angeles, Seattle (RECAP), and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Every doubt, reservation, or concern I had about my restoration was resolved by achieving additional foreskin LENGTH.....So just KOT !

    Comment

    Working...
    X