If you are attempting to address my points then it would be a better argument on your part to actually do that, rather than ignore them, which you've done throughout your above post. Instead you continue to use stalking horse arguments, essentially using up bandwidth with no help for the newbies. The science I was referring to is the established sciences of skin expansion, and epidermal mitotic processes. Can we ever transfer those revelations to what we do, with the equipment we use? No, probably not successfully, except when wild claims are made from some suspiciously "more successful" individual (your words). Then, they can easily be refuted. I call them obvious liars simply because their claims fly in the face of what Science has found to be true. They post here all the time. Not knowing those basics, they continue to make their ridiculous claims about techniques and substances they claim help in somehow magically affecting that "success". They lie, and they hope YOU think they are successful (apparently they rely on you to pump up their ego). Some of the time frames you mention are good examples of this. Biological processes can only proceed at a natural pace, but the big claim to fame is always that they found some BS magic to speed things.
And I have to say, Science is NEVER the uneducated approach, "technical" or otherwise. It's the exact opposite. If you knew anything about the scientific method , you'd know that. Science always begins with the KNOWN! I don't know why you have to promote your personal feelings about Science (is it that you don't know anything about it, and you know it?), but you are doing just that. So the question becomes, what would you replace Science with, in an informative guide for newbies? Feelings? Now THAT would be the uneducated approach. Why say anything if you don't know what the hell you're talking about, or you can't refer to what the pros know? Is it just to pump YOUR ego?
And I have to say, Science is NEVER the uneducated approach, "technical" or otherwise. It's the exact opposite. If you knew anything about the scientific method , you'd know that. Science always begins with the KNOWN! I don't know why you have to promote your personal feelings about Science (is it that you don't know anything about it, and you know it?), but you are doing just that. So the question becomes, what would you replace Science with, in an informative guide for newbies? Feelings? Now THAT would be the uneducated approach. Why say anything if you don't know what the hell you're talking about, or you can't refer to what the pros know? Is it just to pump YOUR ego?
Comment